Search for: ""Dewsnup v. Timm" OR "502 U.S. 410""
Results 21 - 25
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 2:52 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410, 417 (1992). [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:46 am
” The Court reasoned that Congress must have had a full understanding of the pre-Code rule that liens pass through the bankruptcy unaffected, and, “given the ambiguity in the text, the Court was not convinced that Congress intended to depart from that rule. 502 U.S. 410, 112 S. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:00 pm
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992), stating that she found no authority in it that prevents a Chapter 7 debtor from cramming down a second mortgage in a Chapter 7 case. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
., Dewsnup v. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
., Dewsnup v. [read post]
