Search for: ""Kyllo v. United States" OR "533 U.S. 27"" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by MBettman
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001)(“well into the 20th century, [the court’s] Fourth Amendment jurisprudence was tied to common-law trespass. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 10:26 am by Paul Rosenzweig
  Equally fortunately, I can confidently state that none of the programs we will be discussing today were within my purview when I was at the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 8:15 am by Susan Brenner
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), which I’ve discussed in prior posts.In Kyllo, federal agents who suspected Danny Lee Kyllo was growing marijuana in hishome in a triplex, . . . used a thermal-imaging device to scan the triplex to determine if the amount of heat emanating from it was consistent with the high-intensity lamps typically used for indoor marijuana growth. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 11:43 am by Daniel Solove
United States533 U.S. 27 (2001) (whether the technology is in general public use). [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:11 am by Nate Nieman
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), grappled with a similar invasion of privacy in the context of one’s home. [read post]