Search for: ""Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes" OR "564 U.S. 338"" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:09 am by Patrick T. Ryan
It then rejected the argument that nothing in Rule 23 prohibits a negotiation class as failing to recognize the Supreme Court’s guidance in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:04 pm by Thomas Kaufman and Melissa Smith
  Justice Kennedy further explained that this ability for individuals to rely on the statistical evidence in their individual cases distinguished this case from Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 9:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), some members of the putative class in that case filed new, regional class actions against Wal-Mart, including Love v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:10 am by Greg Mersol
The Court emphasized that it was not altering the holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:27 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Noting that Bass Pro’s argument appeared to implicate due process concerns under the Seventh Amendment, the Panel held that Bass Pro’s reliance on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 9:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), some members of the putative class in that case filed new, regional class actions against Wal-Mart, including Love v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011) What This Means For Employers While it certainly is not difficult to imagine the EEOC or any entity positing its best numbers when publishing a self-review, employers absolutely need to pay attention  to these results. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Patrick T. Ryan
  By contrast, the Court said that its disapproval of the plaintiffs’ attempt to use sampling and statistical evidence in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:57 am by Patrick T. Ryan
  By contrast, the Court said that its disapproval of the plaintiffs’ attempt to use sampling and statistical evidence in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]