Search for: "***lanham v. Matthews"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
IMatthew David Brozik blogged here about Tiffany v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:07 am
Native American Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Jireh Publ’g, Inc., 332 F.3d 915 (6th Cir. 2003) (use of professional golfer’s likeness in prints sold for profit protected by First Amendment); Matthews v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
In fact, the USPTO initially has refused registration of WHARTON ADVISORS CORP under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, based on a perceived likelihood of confusion with the WHARTON CAPITAL mark — none of the University’s WHARTON marks were cited as potential bars to registration. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 2:15 pm
Section 43(A) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:36 am
In fact, the USPTO initially has refused registration of WHARTON ADVISORS CORP under Section 2(d) of the Lanham Act, based on a perceived likelihood of confusion with the WHARTON CAPITAL mark — none of the University’s WHARTON marks were cited as potential bars to registration. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:04 am
[We are all very proud of you, Matthew. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 2:54 pm
See, e.g., Camacho, 523 F.3d at 981; Hensley v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:44 am
Milso Industries Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Last year, the 9th Circuit decided in UMG v. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 4:34 pm
" See Brandenburg v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
Let’s start with the Lanham Act. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am
Lebson, and Matthew D. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
Aiyer’s judicial dictionary : a complete law lexicon Nagpur : LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa, 2011 2 v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Matthew B. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Matthew J. [read post]
