Search for: "*davis v. U. S"
Results 21 - 40
of 425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Louis U. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 am
” Nevertheless, this claim is enunciated by the Court in Allard v Gumenick 2023 NY Slip Op 32696(U) August 4, 2023 Supreme Court, New York CountyDocket Number: Index No. 158750/2022 Judge: Lisa S. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
S. 573 (1986); and Baldwin v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The claimants argue that the delay in filing the claims resulted from the newspaper’s concealment of its staff’s behaviour. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
However, last week The Guardian reported that Judge Davis had sanctioned the news company for withholding records from the claimants until the eve of the trial. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 3:24 am
Appel v New York City Police Dept. 2023 NY Slip Op 30786(U) March 16, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155293/2022Judge: Judy H. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:13 am
On 7 February, the Full Federal Court upheld Justice Thawley’s finding, dismissing Facebook Inc’s appeal. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
” Carroll v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
The District Court concluded that Davis's allegations in his 28 U. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
Davis L. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am
In last week’s New York Business Divorce, we wrote about an important decision from New York’s highest court, Sage Sys., Inc. v Liss (___ NY3d ___, 2022 NY Slip Op 05918 [Ct App Oct. 20, 2022]). [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
Davis St. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am
” (Grant v Mendez, 2013 NY Slip Op 33750[U], *3 [Sup Ct, Westchester County 2013]). [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:11 am
[Davis v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 3:05 pm
U. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:32 am
And so even if there was some malpractice, successor counsel had a chance to address it (Davis v Cohen & Gresser, LLP, 160 AD3d 484, 487, 74 NYS3d 534 [1st Dept 2018] [dismissing a legal malpractice claim where a successor counsel had sufficient time to protect plaintiff’s interests and failed to do so]). [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
Davis of The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty. [read post]
