Search for: "*u. S. v. Strickland"
Results 21 - 40
of 78
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2012, 9:30 am
Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:58 am
See Strickland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:15 pm
S. 129, 131 (1968), and Brookhart v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am
United States, 556 U. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 5:32 am
S. 335, 344–345 (1963), and that the right to “the assistance of counsel” includes the right to effective assistance, Strickland v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:43 pm
Buck applies Strickland v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
Alvarado, 541 U. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:53 pm
See Strickland v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:52 pm
See Strickland v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am
But Lee’s conviction should still stand, the government argued, because the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:53 am
") He first says that counsel for Bolin didn't use all his peremptory challenges to excuse everyone who watched the show on America’s Most Wanted, and says (probably correctly) that "[u]nder California law, counsel’s failure to exhaust all their peremptory challenges is at the very least a 'significant' factor supporting the denial of a renewed motion to change venue. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
Moore, 562 U. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:52 pm
Justice Ginsburg's concurrence was much more mild: To prevail under the prejudice requirement of Strickland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:47 pm
” This Strickland v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:09 pm
S., at 689. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:46 pm
The Full Court of the Family Court in Strahan and Strahan has restated the approach to be taken for interim property settlement.The wife successfully appealed against orders by Strickland J that awarded her $1 million by way of interim property settlement. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 1:36 pm
If you're poor and not yet convicted, you may get the benefit of a Strickland v. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 8:04 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:51 am
Washington’s (466 U. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am
Whether you’re good with lack of preservation arguments, or the exceptionally low bar of Strickland v. [read post]
