Search for: "*weaver v. U. S"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Marcus, Assessing Cafa's Stated Jurisdictional Policy, 156 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:57 am
S. 438 (1928), overruled by Katz v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The Times, for example, will attach an “Editor’s Note” to the web version of an article to allow the subject of the article a form of redress. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
[See, also, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, and County of Nassau (Department Of Public Works), U-27544, 6/26/08].However, the decision in the Weaver case, People v Weaver, 12 NY3d 433, may have an impact on the use of GPS equipment, or the evidence obtained from such devices, in administrative disciplinary hearings.The Weaver decision indicates that “In the early morning hours of December 21, 2005, a State Police Investigator… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:15 am
See Media Copyright Group, LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm
Luckily, Tennessee's Costitution has greater protectons than the U. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 6:04 am
(SGI) v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:01 am
Weaver, 636 F. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Weaver, supra (citing Theofel v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Weaver (Louisville). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
Maryland, 442 U. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 11:00 pm
David Nimmer, In the Shadow of the Emperor: The Hatam Sofer’s Copyright Rulings, (The Torah u-Madda Journal, 2009). [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 4:44 pm
Butcher’s concerns about the FBS, the above-referenced authors support the use of the FBS. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:08 am
Butcher’s concerns about the FBS, the above-referenced authors support the use of the FBS. [read post]
14 May 2009, 4:17 am
Using a global positioning device to track the location of individuals while at workPeople v Weaver, 2009 NY Slip Op 03762, Decided on May 12, 2009, Court of AppealsA number disciplinary actions taken against employees were initiated by, or relied upon, the use of global positioning equipment installed in the employer's vehicle or in the employer-issued cell phone. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
In Morris v. [read post]
