Search for: ",In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B., Parent."
Results 21 - 40
of 90
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
The mother’s allegations of domestic violence during her marriage to the respondent, and that the respondent “never intended to be a decent and loving parent to [the child] as promised,” did not amount to fraud or otherwise provide a legal ground upon which the order of adoption may be vacated.Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThird Department Joins Fourth Department holding child in a custody matter does not have full party statusIn… [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm
It was said to b a compilation of the details of “29 children in 13 families who were killed…as a result of contact (and in one case residence) arrangements”. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
A.B.C. in the matter of P.C., a minor, __ N.J. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 5:33 pm
She challenges ACS's reliance on the NYPD and medical reports, arguing that they were prepared in conjunction with her criminal investigation and not child protective matters. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The 2016 Guidelines provide, among other things, that Aif a proceeding seeks to terminate the parental rights of one parent, that proceeding falls within ICWA=s definition of >child‑custody proceeding= even if the child will remain in the custody of the other parent or a step‑parent@ (2016 Guidelines [B][2] ). [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
The trial court ruled against Susan in both matters. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Neulinger caused a stir because the ECHR seemed to suggest that a fuller, welfare-based investigation might be appropriate in Article 13(b) cases, based on the need to respect the rights of the abducting parent and the child under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
¶2 Hagel and Joshua J. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Michael B. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
(b) In all Indian child custody proceedings, as defined in the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, the court shall consider all of the findings contained in subdivision (a), strive to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families, comply with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, and seek to protect the best interest of the child. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Broadly: divorce, civil partnership and financial matters are not 'relevant family proceedings'. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
(b) maintaining any child’s safety on a road remains a normal parenting role (c) I recommend use of a bathboard and seat, or other aid to facilitate bathing… In summary, it remains my view that the current accommodation is suitable on specific medical grounds. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
Super. 234, 246-47 (J. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
The court’s job is to make decisions about publication of information based upon a) legislation and court rules b) the welfare of the child and c) the competing human rights issues. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:49 am
Any such effect on the wife as custodial parent would of necessity have a detrimental effect on the child… I am satisfied that the passport should not be released. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
As to the applicable standard of review when assessing a hearing judge’s conclusions concerning custody in a child welfare context, Van de Perre v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:09 am
The judgment following the rehearing in the case of M (Children) [2016] EWCA Civ 61 (02 February 2016) has now been published, see Re M (No 2) [2016] EWHC 1658 (Fam) (19 May 2016), a judgment of Newton J. [read post]
