Search for: ",In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. B. T., Parent."
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2015, 12:49 am
Any such effect on the wife as custodial parent would of necessity have a detrimental effect on the child… I am satisfied that the passport should not be released. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:09 am
The judgment following the rehearing in the case of M (Children) [2016] EWCA Civ 61 (02 February 2016) has now been published, see Re M (No 2) [2016] EWHC 1658 (Fam) (19 May 2016), a judgment of Newton J. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:45 am
It doesn’t matter how the assets are titled. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:40 pm
McFarlane J echoed what he had said in Re W about the importance of parents taking responsibility for their children’s relationship with both parents: at para 59 Re D (A Child) [2014] EWCA Civ 1057, It is they [the parents] who, on those findings, hold the key that might unlock matters for B. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:02 pm
The question presented was whether the bypass provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 361.5, subdivision (b)(13), apply where the parents have never been offered family reunification services and neither parent was previously a subject of court-ordered treatment. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Bureau 1, 2 (2014); Robert B. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
That said, the welfare of the child is, of course, a really important factor in any case involving a child, because welfare is integral to the child’s right to private and family life – but it’s important to recognise that it still isn’t a trump card. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
In Elisa B. v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:20 am
So although there was some criticism of the Local Authority from the father, that criticism wasn’t made out (and on the basis of what we are told in the judgment it does appear as if the difficulty really was that the father simply didn’t have the sort of high level parenting skills that this little girl needed and wouldn’t be able to develop them quickly, rather than any failure on the part of the local authority – essentially the expert… [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
And a parent may ‘curtail a child's exercise of the constitutional rights . . . [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
As for psychologists, there may be a small number of cases where a social worker will to readily attempt to pass the buck for assessment to a psychologist, but in my experience there is usually a genuine need for the particular insight a psychologist can bring, to help the social workers understand parental behaviour in order to inform a plan for support or care, or to help really identify what it is that a child needs from a placement and whether or not a return will actually be… [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
Opinion BUDD, J. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:53 pm
He would then say to me “how stupid are you, you can’t even get the blinds right. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
“It’s déjà vu all over again. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:48 am
He stated that he initially responded to the ad in order to make his current partner jealous, but that he became concerned for the welfare of the “child” during their conversation. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 2:12 pm
It is well settled that the paramount concern in a custody proceeding arising out of a parental dispute is "the best interest of the child[ren], and what will best promote the child[ren's] welfare and happiness" (Eschbach v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
(a)(b)(1); count 1), and resisted an officer (§ 148, subd. [read post]
