Search for: ",In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents."
Results 21 - 40
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
” 750 ILCS 5/602.7(b) Illinois divorce and parentage courts don’t really focus on the parents. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The Code does not typically have special rules for special areas of practice, but family violence is not strictly a family law matter. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
’s overnight stays at the marital homes and on vacation were always in a babysitter capacity with the children present, that R.L. slept in a room at the marital home assigned to her by the wife, and that R.L. always attended any social events in a babysitter capacity with the wife and children present. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:15 am
" We clarified that the "state's compelling interest to protect a child in any given case, however, is not triggered unless a court finds that a parent's speech is causing or will cause harm to a child's welfare. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
See also Mass R. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:48 pm
R. [read post]
17 May 2020, 10:18 am
If the matter does not affect the children directly, the court will not consider that matter when awarding parenting time. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:06 am
R. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:06 am
R. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Gary B. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 4:23 am
Gulian and her parents. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Berry was not represented in the family law matter creating additional challenges. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
They are the natural parents of two children, one deceased minor son and one minor daughter with special needs (“T.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
R. 5. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 8:26 am
“[T]he language of [section] 1914 itself ... limits standing to challenge state-law terminations of parental right to parents ‘from whose custody such child was removed’ ” (Matter of Adoption of Child of Indian Heritage, 111 N.J. 155, 179, 543 A.2d 925, 937, quoting 25 USC § 1914; see Matter of S.C., 1992 OK 98, ¶ 23, 833 P.2d 1249, 1254, overruled on other grounds Matter of Baby Boy L., 2004 OK 93, 103 P.3d… [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Holyfield, 490 U.S. at 36, 109 S.Ct. 1597; see 25 USC ' 1911[b]). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
An organization has “associational” standing to bring claims on behalf of its members if “(a) its members would otherwise have standing to sue in their own right; (b) the interests it seeks to protect are germane to the organization’s purpose; and (c) neither [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 12:42 am
We are the children of an invading culture. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
And when a doctor describes to expectant parents that it will be expensive and emotionally burdensome if they choose to have a child that genetic tests show may have a disability. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
