Search for: "- Strickland"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2023, 5:26 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
11 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
The court rejected this claim, citing precedent that the possibility of a jury pardon cannot be a basis for prejudice under Strickland. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:12 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 10:39 am
Strickland , Marc-Joseph Gansah , Brian M. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm
Strickland, 318 N.C. 653, 656, 351 S.E.2d 281, 283 (1987) (same); cf. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
ShareThe Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 9:10 am
On this note, it is very interesting to review the Texas case of Strickland v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:16 pm
While Strickland requires only “a reasonable probability that . . . the result of the proceeding would have been different,” the lower court wrongly used a higher outcome determinative standard: “that but for the act or omission in question, the outcome of the proceedings would have been different. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am
The Court of Appeals took up defendant’s current appeal and applied the two-prong analysis from Strickland v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 5:56 pm
Strickland, 77 N.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Strickland, 531 F.3d 406, 408 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 8:51 pm
Illinois, 440 U.S. 367 (1979)); requiring that counsel be effective (Strickland v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:04 am
That court also ordered that the Strickland analysis be conducted “consistent with [its] opinion. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:02 pm
As I wrote before, in September 2020, four months after the murder of George Floyd, Memphis Mayor Jim Strickland convened an advisory council that included clergy, civil rights leaders, legislators, public defenders, and police officers, and charged it with “reimagining policing” in the city. [read post]
