Search for: "-CJS Bates v. Bottom" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2017, 3:16 am by Giles Peaker
The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chambers) has answered this in Westmark (Lettings) Ltd v Peddle & Ors (2017) UKUT 449 (LC). [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:03 am by Adam Feldman
This set includes Blackmun’s 11,526-word opinion in Bates v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm by Daniel Richardson
  [17] Bates Turner’s school trained about 175 students between 1807 and 1812. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am by Frank Cranmer
She appealed, and in Higgs v Farmor’s School [2023] EAT 89 the Appeal Tribunal ruled in her favour, at least provisionally. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:54 am
Bottom line: Are our clients better off now than when we started? [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:09 am
 While the world waits with bated breath for the abatement of the dreaded wipd.biz site, a sudden thought has struck the IPKat. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Benjamin EidelsonThis post offers preliminary analysis of DHS v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm by Elie Mystal
Let us know at tips@abovethelaw.com (subject line: “Gregory Berry”).Meanwhile, we all wait with bated breath for the Kasowitz response.GREGORY BERRY — EMAILS SENT TO HIS CLASSMATES AT PENN LAWSubject: The People of the State of California v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am by Bexis
  We of course like preemption, but after our side lost Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:34 pm
The bottom line in Wisconsin (and many other states) is this. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:30 am by Benjamin Wittes
As a preliminary matter, I can’t help but reflect for a moment on how we got to where we are: Most people, I think, do not have a quarrel with the bottom-line conclusions and results. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 7:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
But in dealing overseas with major Al Qaeda figures who hold American citizenship, the Obama administration confronts a slippery slope with not one, but two distinct bottoms. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm by Bernie Burk
”  The American Arbitration Association website touts its retired judicial officers for private ADR services by asserting that “A former judge brings the distinction of the courts to the time and cost savings of arbitration and mediation,” and helpfully explains in smaller print at the bottom of the page that “*Judges will refer to “former judges” for the purpose of this panel” of personnel (italics original; see here). [read post]