Search for: "-FKB Phillips v. Banks" Results 21 - 40 of 387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2022, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
On 12 May 2022, there were hearings in the cases of Lee -v- Brown before Collins Rice J and MPL -v- WSZ before Saini J. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
On 5 May 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Hamblin v News Group Newspapers Limited before Nicklin J On 6 May 2022, there was a hearing in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley Lennon before Nicklin J. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 9:36 pm by Amanda Anderson
However, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) protects consumers from harassing, threatening, and abusive debt collection tactics used by collection agencies and their attorneys.In a case titled Ruffin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 4 April 2022, there was application in the case of QRT v JBE before Saini J. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down in Stadler v Currys Group Ltd [2022] EWHC 160 (QB) on the 1 February 2022. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
 November 24, 2021Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state In Matter of Phillip D.S. --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 5364714, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
However, “a waiver of sovereign immunity cannot, on its own, extend a court’s subject matter jurisdiction” (Oneida Indian Nation v Phillips, 981 F3d at 171), and “[w]aivers of [sovereignty] are to be strictly construed in favor of the Tribe” (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Chukchansi Economic Dev. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Contracts: SDNY Says the Pandemic is a “Force Majeure” This Shearman blog reviews the SDNY’s recent decision in JN Contemporary Art  v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
Pennsylvania and Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]