Search for: "122 - State v Myer"
Results 21 - 26
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
App. 120, 122 (1975). [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:54 am
This case shows again that special care needs to be taken with extension states and fees, because fewer remedies are available if these are missed. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The proposed settlement was entered into under the authority granted EPA in Section 122(h) of CERCLA, and requires the Respondents to pay $600,000.00 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund in settlement of past costs. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, February 24, 2010 In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
