Search for: "184 Food Corp." Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2017, 7:29 am by Brian Corrigan
A later contract will not supersede an earlier contract unless either: (1) the later contract contains definitive language reflecting the parties’ intent to supersede the earlier contract or (2) the two contracts deal with precisely the same subject matter (Globe Food Services Corp. v Consolidated Edison Co., 184 AD2d 278 [1st Dept 1992]). [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 7:14 pm
 On the anniversary of St Francis of Assisi's death, Pope Francis celebrates Mass before the Saint's tomb and signs his Encyclical "Fratelli tutti". [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Troy Kessler
Seeger, 380 U.S. 163, 184 (1965).Courts that have considered the issue of sincerity of religious beliefs in the context of labor and employment litigation have held that while employers may inquire into a worker’s religious beliefs when they are seeking an accommodation, they must do so in a limited fashion solely to ascertain the sincerity of the religious belief. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Moreover, the ordinance was not a retail food safety measure and thus, was not preempted under the California Health & Safety Code because the provisions relating to single-use articles did not demonstrate legislative intent to preempt local regulation of single-use checkout bags. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am by Joel R. Brandes
 December 14, 2022Pendente lite child support award will not be disturbed absent exigent circumstances or failure to consider appropriate factors. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
” However, the court may have overlooked the absence in the record of any indication that Reymond F. played a significant role in raising, nurturing or caring for the child provided food, clothing and shelter for the child for most of his life or otherwise carried out all the traditional responsibilities of a father. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Moreover, the ordinance was not a retail food safety measure and thus, was not preempted under the California Health & Safety Code because the provisions relating to single-use articles did not demonstrate legislative intent to preempt local regulation of single-use checkout bags. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:19 am
Okulsky Memorial Highway 205 S4212 VOLKER -- Increases the maximum penalty for disobeying a judicial subpoena from fifty to one hundred fifty dollars 204 S4147 MORAHAN -- Authorizes certain physicians to administer buprenorphine to addicts under certain conditions 203 S4125 LIBOUS -- Extends authorization of the county of Tioga to impose an additional one percent of sales and compensating use taxes until November 30, 2009 202 … [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, the authors revisit the question of whether or not securities class action lawsuits against development-stage biotech companies are likelier to survive a motion to dismiss compared to securities suits against other kinds of companies. [read post]