Search for: "26/32 N LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2022, 7:45 am by Eugene Volokh
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have an article out about the Dormant Commerce Clause, geolocation, and state regulations of Internet transactions in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
  Jack Sharman is chair of the White-Collar Criminal Defense and Corporate Investigations practice group at Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC. [read post]
Since President Biden issued his July 2021 Executive Order on Competition, the antitrust agencies have made broad policy statements promising more aggressive enforcement and have initiated a number of high-profile enforcement actions. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by admin
., LLC, 26 N.Y.3d 801, 48 N.E.3d 937, 28 N.Y.S.3d 656 (2016) (affirming exclusion of Kramer); The Little Hocking Water Ass’n v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
This is not simply a matter of the—already controversial[32]—historical attempts by the agency to define under Section 5 conduct that goes outside the Sherman Act. [read post]
The paper must be distributed in the decedent’s county of residence.[26] An affidavit called the Proof of Publication from the newspaper must be completed.[27] All claims against the decedent’s estate must be made within four months after the second publication or they are forever barred.[28] Notices mailed to known creditors will be barred one month after the notice is sent or within four months after the publication of the second notice, whichever is later.[29] The executor… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[I blogged an early draft of this essay three months ago, but I've revised it extensively since then. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, 752 F.3d 82, 89 (1st Cir. 2014) (affirming exclusion of expert witness who failed to account for confounding in event studies), aff’g 853 F. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Clarence N., 110 A.D.3d 430, 430–431, 972 N.Y.S.2d 245 [1st Dept. 2013]; Matter of Jose M. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[32] Specifically, “[t]he protection afforded to workers should outweigh the economic consequences to the regulated industry. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A&N Trading Co., No. 19-2951 (2d Cir. [read post]