Search for: "A CHOICE FOR WOMEN V. AGENCY FOR HEALTH"
Results 21 - 40
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm
The matter must either relate to serious misconduct, or it must otherwise be important for safeguarding the public welfare in matters of health and safety (or of comparable public importance) that the information should be known to whom it is disclosed. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 5:53 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization ruling. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:40 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 4:40 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
Jackson Women’s Health. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
Jackson Women’s Health. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Ordinarily, courts are exceedingly deferential to an agency’s interpretation of its own rules, and for good reason: the agency wrote them, after all. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The agency stated that the revised rule would help identify public health threats. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 3:21 am
The briefing observes that “[a]n access to information approach to gender equality and women’s empowerment means ensuring women are able to access information to make informed choices on elements of their lives, push their governments and other power-holders to guarantee their rights, have greater agency and control over their lives, and more meaningfully engage in public life. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization did not revive the older laws—which included criminal penalties for individuals who aid or abet abortion—because they had been invalidated as unconstitutional by Roe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Jackson Women’s Health — in overturning Roe v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The Financial Conduct Authority has announced it is continuing the initiative to provide synthetic data sets “to help increase innovation and choice in financial services. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 2:10 pm
The theory is that it is the rational choice not to be a partisan judge. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Given the history of women being prosecuted for their reproductive choices and the enormous holes in HIPAA that have long allowed prosecutors to rely on healthcare information as the basis for criminal charges, these assurances rang hollow (as detailed at length in our forthcoming article, HIPAA v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Department of Public Health, Massachusetts began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples in May 2004. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
The envelope please: the award for American law’s worst moment of 2022 goes to the United States Supreme Court for its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization.Because law’s infamous rulings generally do not fly below the radar, it is hardly a surprise to name Dobbs, which has already been subject to withering criticism. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Jackson Women’s Health. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
”The 2022 Annual Report provides a detailed account of the systematic and often brutal efforts by the government of People’s Republic of China (PRC) to censor, torture, and detain critics of Chinese Communist Party policy, rights defenders and human rights lawyers, advocates of free speech, religious freedom and women’s rights, and ethnic minorities. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
