Search for: "A M v. Review Board" Results 21 - 40 of 2,589
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Upon receipt, the superintendent convenes a review committee, which then has 60 days to review the challenged materials and submit a report to the superintendent. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Upon receipt, the superintendent convenes a review committee, which then has 60 days to review the challenged materials and submit a report to the superintendent. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am by Guest Author
’  They will say that the role belongs to the Department of Labor and the National Labor Relations Board. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
” It posited the following series of events: “A school board president announces at a school board meeting that the board has lifted pandemic-era restrictions on public schools,” and, later, “at a backyard barbecue with friends whose children attend public schools,” shares the identical information. [read post]