Search for: "A P.2." Results 21 - 40 of 26,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 6:31 am
Today, the Commission is considering amendments to Regulation S-P that will require covered firms to notify their customers of data breaches. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:31 am
Today, the Commission is considering amendments to Regulation S-P that will require covered firms to notify their customers of data breaches. [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
As neither House of Parliament has raised an objection by 17 May 2024,[1] the way seems to be paved for the Government’s ambitious plans to have the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention[2] implemented and ratified by the end of June 2024.[3] For the first time since the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (so-called Brexit) on 31 January 2020, a general multilateral instrument would thus once again be put in place to govern the mutual recognition and enforcement of… [read post]
17 May 2024, 2:56 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Professional shortcomings or disagreements as to litigation strategy that do not involve intentional false statements in the context of litigation may sound in legal malpractice, but [*2]not in attorney deceit” under Judiciary Law § 487 (Urias v Daniel P. [read post]
16 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Under the amended Regulation S-P, covered firms, including registered investment advisers, will be required to notify customers if their sensitive customer information was, or is reasonably likely to have been, accessed or used without authorization. [read post]
We particularly commend that while the strategy focuses heavily on encouraging international cooperation, it also highlights the need for such cooperation to complement national or regional initiatives instead of attempting to derail them (Principle 2, Part III-A). [read post]
15 May 2024, 5:38 pm by Administrator
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) 2. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Upon finding that the subject of the investigation has committed a violation of applicable law, defendant may impose penalties or fines (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [n]), as well as refer the matter to the individual's employer for disciplinary action (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]) or recommend the impeachment of statewide elected officials (see Executive Law § 94 [10] [p] [ii]). [read post]