Search for: "A PTY Ltd." Results 21 - 40 of 1,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2014, 11:35 pm by noreply@blogger.com (Gareth Shepperson)
The most important cases dealing with Business Rescue – Don Mahon | South African Commercial Law BlogAll in all, I would say that there are about 35 judgments relating to business rescue which every practitioner or business with an interest in Business Rescue, should read.In the coming weeks, I will provide a summary and analysis of each one in turn.For the moment, however, they can be downloaded here.ABSA v Newcity.pdfAG PETZETAKIS INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD v PETZETAKIS AFRICA… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:41 am by Barry Eagar
Federal Court:Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd v Paul’s International Pty Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 1162Full Federal Court:Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sporte Leisure Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 51S123 of the Trade Marks Act sets out that a person does not infringe a trade mark if the trade mark has been applied by or with the consent of the registered owner of the trade mark.Infringement takes place when the alleged infringing use is use as… [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
The Full Court has found: claims 1 and 5 of Australian Innovation Patent No 2006100980, in the name of Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd (‘SI’) (the ‘first innovation patent’) to be infringed by Richard Bass Pty Ltd (‘Bass’); and all claims of Australian Innovation Patent No 2008100126 to be valid (and also infringed by Bass). [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 7:12 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 121 (15 September 2011) Appeal from: Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1169 See also: Innovation Patent Claims Once Again Construed Narrowly Claim construction –  whether ‘device’ encompasses apparatus in two parts In an appeal from a decision of Justice Barker in the Federal Court of Australia, a full bench of the… [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:09 am by Mark Summerfield
Richard Bass Pty Ltd & Anor v Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd [2012] HCATrans 24 (10 February 2012) In a special leave hearing last Friday, before Chief Justice French and Justice Bell in the High Court of Australia, lawyers for Richard Bass Pty Ltd sought unsuccessfully to persuade the court to hear an appeal from a decision of the Full Federal Court handed down last July. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
The court remanded the case to the Board to reconsider its selected genus and to conduct a genericness analysis in light of that genus (Real Foods Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 8:41 pm by Mark Summerfield
Back in March we wrote about a number of ongoing cases between original manufacturer AstraZeneca AB, and generic pharmaceutical companies Apotex Pty Ltd, Watson Pharma Pty Ltd and Ascent Pharma Pty Ltd, over cholesterol drug rosuvastatin, marketed in Australian by AstraZeneca as CRESTOR. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:49 am by Dr Mark Summerfield
Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Multigate Medical Products Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 86 (12 July 2011) Appeal from: Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Multigate Medical Products Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1318 See also: That’s a Wrap! [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 1:00 am
Barrett Property Group Pty Ltd v Metricon Homes Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1509 (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/federal_ct/2007/1509.html) was an action between two competing project home developers in the market in Victoria. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by Mark Summerfield
Appeal Decision: Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 102 (18 July 2012) Appeal from: Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd v Apotex Pty Ltd (No 3) [2011] FCA 846 See also: Australian Federal Court ‘Evergreens’ ARAVA for Sanofi-Aventis Claim construction – second medical use claims directed to treating specific ailments –… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:49 am by Barry Eagar
Case:  Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1169Judge:  Barker JHeadnoteThis court considered the question of whether or not "a device" has one or two parts. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 11:32 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Baxter Healthcare Pty Limited [2007] HCA 38 the High Court  upheld the ACCC's appeal against findings by the Full Federal Court that Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd was protected from the operation of the Trade Practices Act 1974 by Crown immunity. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 7:53 pm
In Inform Design and Construction Pty Ltd v Boutique Homes Melbourne Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 912  the Federal Court rejected a copyright claim in house plans (see previous note on Barrett v Metricon). [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 6:02 am by Candice Grieve
Amongst these companies were the first respondent, Tegeta Exploration and Resources (Pty) Ltd, and its three subsidiaries, Optimum Coal Mine (Pty) Ltd (OCM), Koornfontein Mines (Pty) Ltd and Optimum Coal Terminal (Pty) Ltd (OCT). [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 7:57 am by Mark Summerfield
  This week, Justice Middleton has issued two further decisions in the patent infringement case brought by Britax Childcare Pty Ltd (‘Britax’) against Infa-Secure Pty Ltd (‘Infa-secure’). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:00 am by Mark Summerfield
DSI Australia (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Garford Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1411 (7 December 2011) Amendments – application to Federal Court for direction to amend patent – correction of claim dependency In an otherwise unremarkable decision, directing the correction of a trivial error in the claims of a patent owned by Garford Pty Ltd, Justice Yates in the Federal Court of Australia has noted, in passing, a possible oversight in the drafting of… [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:41 am by Chijioke Okorie
Late in May, a High Court in South Africa delivered judgment in Bliss Brands (Pty) Ltd v Advertising Regulatory Board NPC & Others, on the issue of the extent of the powers of the Advertising Regulatory Board (‘ARB’) in matters relating to trade mark and copyright laws. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:56 pm
The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has accepted enforceable undertakings and payments from three companiesâ€"Vodafone Hutchison Australia Pty Limited (VHA), New Dialogue Pty Ltd (New Dialogue), Big Mobile Pty Ltd (Big Mobile)â€"and issued a formal warning to Coca-Cola South Pacific Pty Ltd (CCSP) arising from alleged breaches of the Spam Act 2003 in a marketing campaign that promoted… [read post]