Search for: "A-P-T Research, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
Analysis Research into relevant case law reveals few cases. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The ICO is seeking permission to appeal the ruling on Clearview AI Inc handed down by the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) on 17 October 2023. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
A S H A R E H O L D E R P R O P O S A L T O W A T C H Golden parachutes cushion corporate leaders from the financial risks of a sudden exit by promising substantial severance packages, particularly when there is a change in control. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 6:31 am
A S H A R E H O L D E R P R O P O S A L T O W A T C H Golden parachutes cushion corporate leaders from the financial risks of a sudden exit by promising substantial severance packages, particularly when there is a change in control. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:17 am
This law says that product manufacturers are strictly liable when they sell defective products—meaning that proof of negligence isn’t required. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:17 am
This law says that product manufacturers are strictly liable when they sell defective products—meaning that proof of negligence isn’t required. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:17 am
This law says that product manufacturers are strictly liable when they sell defective products—meaning that proof of negligence isn’t required. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:23 pm
(The companion case, Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. as applicant of the refused application in suit and proprietor of the revoked patent in suit, filed appeals (ex-parte appeal T 2719/19 and inter partes appeal T 1513/17) allocated to the same board of appeal. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
South Coast Framing, Inc. (2015) 61 Cal. 4th 291 , 188 Cal. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am
Unlike presumptions in other contexts,[21] the antitrust agencies appear to be setting up the issue to percolate a bit to see where future research and precedent leads. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Shipman & Elizabeth P. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 12:43 pm
Leasing, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Sternheim, Steven Epstein, Warren S. de Wied and Brian T. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Sternheim, Steven Epstein, Warren S. de Wied and Brian T. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
In this annual roundup, we offer highlights of the commentary and insight that Stanford Law School faculty members provided on key SCOTUS decisions during this year’s term (beginning October 2022). [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:00 am
Sturla, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
They believe that during times of globalization, we should strive to achieve pluralism, diversity, the idea that culture isn’t restricted by borders and unity, rather than an individualistic and self-centered society.[21] To accomplish those goals, encyclopaedic museums are the perfect tool. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Michener, and T. [read post]
