Search for: "A. S. v. Department of Public Welfare (Majority Opinion)"
Results 21 - 40
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In an oft-quoted line, the majority wrote that the child was “not the mere creature of the State”; and this law encroached on the parents’ rights to make basic educational decisions.In a much more recent decision, Troxel v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
Department of Health and Social Services (Indian Child Welfare Act; Mental Health Treatment; Lack of Standing) U.S. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
And the CPSC’s mission is to protect the public from unreasonable risks, not all risks. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
” In Thursday’s opinion, she went further, pointing to the long list of factors related to economic welfare in Section 232 that Congress asked the president to consider before imposing tariffs. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm
” The system, the Court said, actually supports the “general welfare” of the country. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
(But under federal law, she likely wouldn’t have standing.)Next, the majority concludes that the police officer—presumably walking down the driveway as part of a welfare check, but really looking for evidence of the alleged assault a few days earlier—when he “found” the bullet exceeded the limited scope of the license he had to perform the welfare check. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:52 am
Circuit’s plurality opinion in Mass. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Pompeo, 912 F.3d 1018 (7th Cir. 2019); Denial of Rehearing en Banc Barrett’s majority opinion in Yafai v. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
The court's opinion in that case, Cook v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Circuit’s long-awaited decision is State of Ohio v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 6:34 am
” Justice DeWine, to Cleveland’s Law Department Chief Counsel On March 6, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in City of Cleveland v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm
Offensively, to make its misleading minority point, the Department trivializes the differences between Christians by lumping them all into one category, to make it appear there is a “majority” religion. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm
From Judge Dale Drozd's opinion in Clifton v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Justice Andreas also noted that while the majority was concerned about the effect of the credit on the older children, the majority’s opinion disregarded the effect of its position on the youngest child, and on the husband’s ability to care for the older children. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
"] From Justice Christine Donohue's majority opinion (joined by Chief Justice Max Baer and Justices Thomas Saylor and David Wecht) in In the Interest of Y.W. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
As Chief Justice John Roberts put it in his majority opinion in Carson, "a State violates the Free Exercise Clause [of the First Amendment] when it excludes religious observers from otherwise available public benefits," merely because they are religious. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
In this case, the Commissioner of the Department of Labor reasoned that the old language applied. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
" To do in this instance, said the Court of Appeals, would require it "to depart from precedent" and require it to assume that the cases upon which plaintiff in his federal action relies held, by implication, that no special duty is required in the respective factual scenarios based on what was omitted from the Court's opinions and this, said the Court of Appeals, it declined to do. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
" To do in this instance, said the Court of Appeals, would require it "to depart from precedent" and require it to assume that the cases upon which plaintiff in his federal action relies held, by implication, that no special duty is required in the respective factual scenarios based on what was omitted from the Court's opinions and this, said the Court of Appeals, it declined to do. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
