Search for: "ADCOCK v. STATE"
Results 21 - 35
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2010, 11:31 am
No, the Court of Appeals of Virginia ruled in the case of Adcock v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 6:15 am
See Adcock v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 8:21 am
Supreme Court except Daubert v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
South African case law that has referred to European decisions that have caused the UKIPO to summarise the Principles as they have been referred to above include Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro (Sabel v Puma), Laugh it off Promotions v SAB (Canon v MGM), Puma v Global Warming (Marca Mode v Adidas) and Cowbell v ICS Holdings (Canon v MGM). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:57 pm
The case of Adcock Ingram v Cipla Medpro reconsidered the notion that pharmaceuticals sold on prescription are less likely to be confused because they are dispensed by trained professionals in regulated circumstances. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
Levy" Yael V. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:40 pm
The wording of the Directive and RSA trade mark legislation is very similar.The European approach is designed to interpret a trade mark infringement test that applies across 27 Member States and many more languages and cultures. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
The other, published in 2008, is Rebecca Ordish and Alan Adcock's China Intellectual Property Challenges and Solutions (Wiley, details here). [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:00 am
Adcock, 979 F.2d 424 (6th Cir.1992), lends support for the adoption of loss of chance. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
RICKY ADCOCK, No. 11-0934 Opinion of the Court Dissenting The Court holds that a rule issued by a state agency cannot create a procedure to allow decisions about permanent lifetime workers-compensation benefits to be reopened — “a procedure the Legislature deliberately removed in 1989. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 6:25 pm
State, 2006 Alas. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
Forty-five years ago, the baseball world trained its attention on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and its impending decision in the case of Wisconsin v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
State Bar of Nevada2:00-2:30 p.m. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
30 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
In a few of the biggest Supreme Court decisions of the last few years – including Dobbs v. [read post]
