Search for: "ADVANCED SOFTWARE V FEDERAL RESERVE"
Results 21 - 40
of 85
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Michael Rocco, the deputy commandant for manpower and reserve affairs for the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:48 pm
Laird and Marbury v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 8:51 am
(Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:38 am
In Katz v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 11:24 pm
A 1969 decision by the Federal Court of Justice of Germany, Rote Taube ("Red Dove"), defined technicity as the planned use of controllable forces of nature for the purpose of achieving a specific result, and on that basis it would be possible to distinguish a software-controlled braking mechanism or other advanced in an applied natural science from pure advances in software such as more efficient memory (or bandwidth) usage through data… [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 10:47 am
Chris Hoofnagle, they chose opt-out to avoid the IMS v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm
Judgment was reserved. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Back in March 2008, Apple released a software development kit for third party developers in order to create approved apps for use on the iPhone. [read post]
21 May 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 7:30 am
The development of advanced assistive technologies and increased societal accessibility enable persons with disabilities, even severe disabilities, to live and be active members of society. [read post]
3 May 2018, 12:07 pm
Today's Qualcomm v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
Dep’t of State: providing advance notice, furnishing any releasable information, and providing an opportunity to present evidence to the decision-maker. i. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Its proposed definition reserved too many things to lawyers. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
Summary judgment was granted against his federal and state-law discrimination claims (MacEachern v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See Golan v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
Which is strange, because during this time she is mentioned in a November 2, 2001 Justice Department press release as the contact for public comments on the DOJ consent decree with Microsoft–at which point she was the lower rank of “Trial Attorney” before being promoted to Section Chief in January 2002: The proposed Final Judgment will be published by the Federal Register, along with the Department’s Competitive Impact Statement, as required by the… [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:35 am
Eon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
He's done so much for the software industry over the decades. [read post]
