Search for: "ALJ Investment Co., LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2011, 9:29 am by Eric Schweibenz
  According to the complaint, in both of these investigations the ALJ found, on summary determination, the existence of a domestic industry based on InterDigital’s patent licensing activities relating to its wireless communications technology. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:56 am by Marie Louise
’ Debate report (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Unwarranted threats to sue for copyright infringement (1709 Copyright Blog) PCC Page 33: Octopus dress and address: Cautious Co v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
Sutton & Sons, Inc (Property, intangible) District Court N D Illinois: Infringement claims against corporate officers require active participation: Free Green Can, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:51 pm by Alex Gasser
Rogers, Jr. issued public versions of several orders granting Respondent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Leapfrog Enters., Inc (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Invacare – ALJ Charneski Grants Motion To [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:53 am by Eric Schweibenz
  Respondents Panasonic Corporation, Funai Electric Co., Ltd., Funai Corporation, Inc., Victor Company of Japan Limited, JVC Americas Corp., Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, BestBuy.Com, LLC, and Best Buy Stores, L.P., B&H Foto & Electronics Corp., Huppin’s Hi-Fi Photo & Video, Inc., Buy.com Inc., QVC, Inc., Crutchfield Corporation, Computer Nerds International, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:16 pm by Alex Gasser
By way of background, the Complainant in this matter is Motiva, LLC (“Motiva”) and the Respondents are Nintendo Co., Ltd. and Nintendo of America Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am by Kelly
SEB (Washington State Patent Law Blog) Interactive Life Forms – ALJ Luckern terminates two respondents in Elastomeric Gel Investigation (ITC 337 Update) Remy – Remy files new 337 complaint regarding Certain Starter Motors and Alternators (ITC Law Blog) Seiko Espon – Claims construed narrowly to avoid indefiniteness: Only the Fi [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:56 am by Eric Schweibenz
  ALJ Charneski likewise determined that the economic prong was satisfied through evidence showing significant investment in plant and equipment, significant employment of labor and capital, and substantial investment in engineering, research and development related hair irons protected by the CHI mark. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents are MVTec Software GmbH, MVTec LLC, Omron Corporation, Resolution Technology, Inc., Visics Corp., Daiichi Jitsugyo Viswill Co., Ltd., and Daiichi Jitsugyo (America), Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:08 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  The Respondents are MVTec Software GmbH and MVTec LLC, Omron Corporation, Resolution Technology, Inc., Visics Corp., Daiichi Jitsugyo Viswill Co., Ltd., and Daiichi Jitsugyo (America), Inc. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:50 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  A number of respondents were terminated from the investigation and the remaining respondents are MVTec Software GmbH and MVTec LLC, Omron Corporation, Resolution Technology, Inc., Visics Corp., Daiichi Jitsugyo Viswill Co., Ltd., and Daiichi Jitsugyo (America), Inc. [read post]