Search for: "ALLEN v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2010, 7:31 pm by Kelly
Morel (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (Photo Attorney) (Techdirt) Paul Allen’s Interval Licensing refiles suit, accuses Android of patent infringement: Interval Licensing v AOL et al  (FOSS Patents) (ArsTechnica) (Techdirt) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:39 am by Jon Gelman
The Florida Supreme Court order of December 22, 2015, in the case now styled Florida Workers' Advocates, et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Century City Apartments Property Services CC and Another v Century City Property Owners Association (Afro-IP)   Spain A branding miracle from: from bullring to shop windows (Class 46)   Ukraine Ukrainian Higher Economic Court denies Ferrero’s claim on Raffaello trade mark infringement: Group Ferrero v Landrin (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC on compensation for employee inventors whose patents are particularly beneficial to employers: Shanks… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Varian (PATracer)   US Copyright The importance of registering copyright in the United States: Elsevier B.V. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm by Christa Culver
Amicus brief of Altera Corporation et al. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm by Law Lady
BROCK SPECIALTY SERVICES, LTD., et al., Appellees. 5th District.Civil procedure -- Striking of pleadings -- Error to enter order striking pleadings as sanction for refusal of plaintiff and her attorney to appear where written order does not make it apparent that court considered all factors set out in Kozel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Rincon Band of Indians (10-330) and Applera Corp., et al., v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:20 am by Anna Christensen
Barr et al.Petitioner's reply Title: Dismuke v. [read post]
  The Executive Order endorsed this approach, noting that “this order reaffirms that the United States retains the authority to challenge transactions whose previous consummation was in violation of the [antitrust laws]. [read post]