Search for: "AM BY AND THROUGH LAW v. Grant" Results 21 - 40 of 2,482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
. , Hearing Co-Chairs: Commissioner Aaron Friedberg and Commissioner Jonathan Stivers 9:30 AM – 9:40 AM: Co-Chairs' Opening Remarks  9:40 AM – 11:10 AM: Panel I: Energy, Investment, and Economic Interests Erica Downs, Senior Research Scholar, Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia SIPA [Testimony]Mohammed Soliman, Director of the Strategic Technologies and Cyber Security Program, Middle East Institute [Testimony]Karen Young, Senior… [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
As regular readers know, I am often an outspoken critics of Justice Kavanaugh's separate writings, but his Labradaor concurrence changed the way I think about the emergency docket. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by Josh Blackman
I am often struck by how often Justice Kavanaugh repeats himself. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[8] The court went on to observe that “[u]sing enforcement actions to address crypto-assets is simply the latest chapter in a long history of giving meaning to the securities laws through iterative application to new situations. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am by Brooke MacKenzie
” and “This decision is a travesty and I strongly hope that the Law Society wins the judicial review”),[5] it appears the public agrees AA should not be a licensed lawyer and supports the Law Society’s decision to keep pushing back through escalating layers of appellate review. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 9:18 am by Eugene Volokh
" Statutes, ordinances, and regulations refer to written law through which a State can authorize an official to speak on its behalf. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:36 am by Jeffrey T. Dinwoodie
  See, e.g., Memorandum of Law in Support of Coinbase’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, SEC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” [4] In explaining the major questions doctrine, the Court stated that “[e]traordinary grants of regulatory authority are rarely accomplished through ‘modest word,’ ‘vague terms,’ or ‘subtle device[s]. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:20 am by David Super
       In his concurrence with the Court’s granting a stay in Bush v. [read post]