Search for: "AO v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:21 am
Wallace concurred, stating though that a modified categorical approach should be used.US v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:37 pm
  The essay is also important for an important judiciary noticeable by its absence--that of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm by Unknown
United States of America (Cultural Resource Damages; Resource Equivalency Analysis) United States of America v. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:50 am by Giles Peaker
R (AO) v LB of Haringey (Central London Administrative Court, 9 May 2024) Interim relief was granted in favour of a mother and two primary school aged children who were being accommodated by the Defendant local authority under section 188(1) Housing Act 1996 in unsuitable bed and breakfast accommodation. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:53 pm by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of WisconsinOpinion Date: 9/7/11Cite: Thiesing v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:51 pm
However, it is submitted that when the dicta cited by the Court referr to classification, they refer to the Legislature being given “a free hand to devise classes – whom to tax or not to tax, whom to exempt and whom not to exempt” (State of U.P. v. [read post]