Search for: "AT & T v. Land"
Results 21 - 40
of 8,222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 5:12 pm
In Kuleana Ku‘ikahi, LLC v. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
In Huck v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm
Doesn’t work. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
It didn’t matter that it was not the exact same understanding – it was enough that it was similar. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:33 am
Bureau of Land Management, held that the BLM violated the National Environmental Policy Act in its assessment of oil and gas leases on federal lands in California. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:31 am
You will recall that in Dundics v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 1:10 pm
Yang stubbornly repeated: “We don’t have good numbers on that. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
Defend Our Waterfront v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:30 pm
Kilakila `O Haleakala v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Hugunin v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 7:54 am
How are these choice lines: "MERS is the Wikipedia of Land Registration Systems. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 2:50 am
See Andrus v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:02 pm
(See, e.g., Waikiki Marketplace Investment Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 11:11 am
From last week's Mississippi Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:13 am
The Supreme Court's courtroom reporter has provided the raw transcript of today's oral arguments in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan ruled that the nation can’t reclaim its ancient lands and the state doesn’t have to pay any money for the 250,000 acres the Oneidas say was illegally taken from them centuries ago. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:22 pm
It isn't often my day job doing land use and condemnation litigation overlaps with my maritime interests, but the Ninth Circuit just published a decision that comes awfully close. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
The majority went onto hold that while the Bighorn National Forest isn’t categorically “occupied,” that doesn’t mean that all areas within the forest are unoccupied. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:58 am
A party seeking to establish such an implied dedication and thereby successfully challenge the alienation of the land must show that: (1) '[t]he acts and declarations by the land owner indicating the intent to dedicate his land to the public use [are] unmistakable in their purpose and decisive in their character to have the effect of a dedication' and (2) that the public has accepted the land as dedicated to a public use (Niagara Falls… [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:05 am
Supreme Court's unanimous opinion in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
