Search for: "AT v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Reynolds, et al. -- immunity of wholesale discount prices to challenge under Robinson-Patman Act solely because they are available to all buyers. 06-1617, Gilles v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 1:26 pm
On May 3, 2019, in Guilford College et al. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 9:06 am
[et al.].Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 2009. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:01 am
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, et al., a case rich in ironic implications. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 11:24 am
Facts: This case (Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. et al v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
North Carolina (Granted )Docket: 09-11121Issue(s): Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of North Carolina)Petition for certiorari (forthcoming)Brief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief for the Juvenile Law Center, et al. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
REES, ET AL., Respondents. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 2:31 pm
There are hundreds of small agencies in North Carolina, many with limited technological and financial resources. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:26 pm
KellerDocket: 10-804Issue(s): (1) Whether the Supreme Court of North Carolina correctly held that the Due Process Clause permitted the state to continue to incarcerate prisoners even though they had been awarded sufficient sentence-reduction credits to mandate release; and (2) whether the Supreme Court of North Carolina correctly held that the Ex Post Facto Clause permitted the state to refuse to honor the sentence-reduction credits awarded to petitioners as… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
KellerDocket: 10-804Issue(s): (1) Whether the Supreme Court of North Carolina correctly held that the Due Process Clause permitted the state to continue to incarcerate prisoners even though they had been awarded sufficient sentence-reduction credits to mandate release; and (2) whether the Supreme Court of North Carolina correctly held that the Ex Post Facto Clause permitted the state to refuse to honor the sentence-reduction credits awarded to petitioners as… [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 11:57 am
Professor Christopher Lund has a forthcoming article in the North Carolina Law Review defending the ministerial exception. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:44 am
North Carolina No. 08-1555, Samantar v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:51 pm
Keck, et al., No. 3:12-cv-02088 (D.S.C.), filed on July 25, 2012 by KV against the South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services challenging the latter’s prior authorization policy favoring compounded HPC formulations over Makena® (ongoing); (3) K-V Pharmaceutical Co., et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 8:00 am
Pneumo Abex, LLC, et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
The issue in Keating, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm
(Patent Docs) US: District Court M D North Carolina: $4.8 million attorneys’ fee award designed to reimburse not punish: Aventis CropScience v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:26 pm
The post Artificial Intelligence and the Courts appeared first on North Carolina Criminal Law. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 10:00 pm
Cooper et al, which is a challenge to North Carolina’s unique ag-gag law. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
