Search for: "ATES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Results 21 - 40
of 71
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
They view courts of the United States, and such statutes as the ATS, with its apparent potential reach to any private actor in the world, as part of America’s political hegemony (to use a provocative term). [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
Opinion below (2d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Brief amici curiae of Washington Legal Foundation et al. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The great object [of the statute]… was to protect the merchant vessels of the United States and their crews from piratical aggressions. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:08 pm
Not surprisingly, the Soviet plan to dethrone America failed miserably. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:16 am
See Bauman v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 8:34 am
One gets hints of this possibility from the Declaration of the Indigenous Peoples Participating in the V Regional Forum On Business And Human Rights For Latin America An The Caribbean which was circulated during the course of the event. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
FULLER, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am
United States – the challenge to Arizona’s S.B. 1070 – as well as the case’s prior history and possible political consequences. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:16 pm
" Â Brief of the United States of America Amicus Curiae Supporting Defendant-Appellees, at 21, Khulumani v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
Bauman v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 6:29 am
Corruption swirled around the highest levels of the United States and of China. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:59 am
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:06 am
It reads, simply: The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf pushes back against Justice Clarence Thomas’ originalist critique of the First Amendment overbreadth doctrine in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am
Federal Trade Commission, 3:24-cv-986, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, filed April 23, 2024; Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am
Although the legal history of boycotts in America is complex, boycotts have widely been considered protected speech since NAACP v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm
In a dramatically divided but decisively 6-3 decision in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
