Search for: "Abbott v. Second Judicial District Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2015, 10:26 am
Abbott Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
Solum, District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
However, the Court, relying on Tahoe Vista Concerned Citizens v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 11:07 am
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Rucho v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
Second, the exemption for rate setting cannot be used for system expansion. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:19 am
In Application of Garcia v Varona--- F.Supp.2d ----, 2011 WL 3805778 (N.D.Ga.) the District Court granted the petition for return. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 8:58 am
The Second District Court of Appeal reversed. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Abbott as conservatives. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 3:00 am
By contrast, in Romo v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:27 am
Upon review, the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District gave deference to the Commission’s determination that no substantial issue existed. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 9:12 am
Turning next to health risks, the appellate court followed the Supreme Court’s holding in CBIA v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
The Third District Court of Appeal applied the California Supreme Court precedent in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:14 am
For second grade, R.V.B. attended a different school in the Elmont School District, Covert Avenue School. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 5:30 am
The Court will dissolve the District Court’s injunction, and dismiss the case on the ground that Texas has asserted no injury that gives it legal “standing” to get into court to present it. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:30 pm
Abbott Saltonstall v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary are as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 4:04 pm
Moving to the second question, however, the appellate court found the use of an addendum was inadequate under CEQA. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 3:03 pm
Applying the two-part test established by the Supreme Court in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
