Search for: "Ace v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc   New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 1 December 2023, Jay J handed down judgment in Dyson v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The Myrontana legislature legalized same-sex marriage in 2010, five years before the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 12:08 am by Adeline Chong
This is reminiscent of a similar omission in the restatement by the UK Supreme Court in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2013] 1 AC 236, [2012] UKSC 46, which has since been taken as authoritative for the proposition that residence is not a basis of international jurisdiction under English common law. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:19 am by Frank Cranmer
Furthermore: “the UK Supreme Court has … affirmed that where a right to abortion exists the state has an obligation to facilitate its exercise and this includes prohibiting harm or hindrance outside abortion clinics: In re Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (NI) Bill [2022] UKSC 32, [2023] AC 505 [115]” [14]. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am by CMS
That doctrine was developed in Bulli Coal Mining Co v Osborne [1899] AC 351 which found that limitation would not be applied “in the case of concealed fraud, so long as the party defrauded remains in ignorance without any fault of his own” and also rejected the idea that “active concealment was essential”. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm by Giles Peaker
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
This concept was described in Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2012] UKSC 46, [2013] 1 AC 236 (“Rubin”) as the “administration of multinational insolvencies by a leading court applying a single bankruptcy law”. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:21 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
Insulation/Contracting 30% No Site List – Minnesota/ND exposures A-Best Insulation 21% Mostly Ohio, but also KY, MI and a number of other states AC & S Insulation/contracting 5.78% Hundreds of additional CA sites given to Trust to review Amatex Asbestos Cloth and related Trust Closed File in Military, Shipyard, Power Plant, Industrial etc.. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm by INFORRM
The natural and ordinary meaning Citing Lord Bridge in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Master Bell emphasised that in order to determine the natural and ordinary meaning of the words of which a plaintiff complains, one must consider the context in which the words were used and the mode of publication [8]. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 3:46 am by SHG
The FBI used a strategy of Analyze, Compare, Evaluate—Verify (ACE-V). [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 7:07 am
States also have a corresponding obligation to regulate the protection of human rights in sport, and to provide access to efficient and effective legal remedies for cases of discrimination or other human rights abuses by sporting bodies or private actors.4. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 10:52 am by Steven Cohen
  The court disagreed, stating that Cornell’s version of the ACE-V methodology is reliable. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 10:26 pm by Frank Cranmer
That right might therefore be overridden by a state body, provided there was a sufficiently pressing need to do so for one of the purposes in Article 9(2) and the means used were both lawful and proportionate, applying the four-stage proportionality test in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) (SC(E)) [2014] AC 700 [at 20] and allowing the state body an appropriate discretionary area of judgment. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am by INFORRM
On the first question, the Judge drew parallels to ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] AC 1158 which established, as a starting point, that a person under criminal investigation has a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]