Search for: "Ackerman v Ackerman"
Results 21 - 40
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Underpinning American scholarship and debate on the potential outcome of Loper Bright v Raimondo is an explicit understanding that executive interpretations of the law can, and sometimes, should, carry more weight than the opinions of judges. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
But a cursory comparison of the equivalent piece of Australian federal legislation to the legislation at issue in Loper Bright Enterprises v Raimondo suggests it is at least not true in all cases. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
More specifically, in his opinion last Term dissenting from a denial of cert in Buffington v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:45 am
In any event, the defendants failed to “offer a reasonable strategic explanation” for recommending pursuit of a mortgage modification agreement less than one month before the scheduled foreclosure auction as the means of avoiding loss of the plaintiffs’ home, as would have been required to establish a defense based upon the attorney judgment rule (Ackerman v Kesselman, 100 AD3d 577, 579 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
” City of Detroit v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Loughlin recognizes the centrality of Reconstruction to American constitutionalism (see his discussion of Bruce Ackerman’s work (p. 146–47)). [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
As an example, consider Rolland v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
” ““A legal malpractice claim accrues ‘when all the facts necessary to the cause of actionhave occurred and an injured party can obtain relief in court’” (McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301 [2002], quoting Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994]). [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:58 am
Darby Scott, Ltd. v Michael S. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
(Ackerman does not call himself an "originalist," but many of Ackerman's former students do work that is implicitly or explicitly originalist.) [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:25 am
A reader flagged a Fourth Circuit decision, which explains that state-court proceedings are put on pause while federal proceedings are litigated: Ackerman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 9:21 am
’ Hopefully it follows Michigan’s lead and rules that it is unconstitutional. appeared first on Ackerman & Ackerman. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:08 pm
In Michael G. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
Mouat (1888) and United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
at 315; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 252 AD2d 179, 205 [1st Dept 1998]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Some progressives’ eyes therefore turn toward an Article V convention. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:31 am
Darby Scott, Ltd. v Michael S. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:56 am
'” appeared first on Ackerman & Ackerman. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 6:58 am
” appeared first on Ackerman & Ackerman. [read post]
