Search for: "Adams v. Craig" Results 21 - 40 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
New online from Law and History Review and Cambridge Core: From Disestablishment to Dartmouth College v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 8:17 am by Erik J. Heels
v=RvV3nn_de2k Since 2001, LawLawLawTM has documented trends in technology, law (mostly patents and trademarks), baseball (mostly Red Sox), and music (mostly rock). [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
Scotland The Press Gazette reports on contempt proceedings in the High Court of Justiciary against blogger and former diplomat, Craig Murray, arising out of his reporting of the Alex Salmond trial. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 6:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Monday, October 12 | 4 PM | ZOOMMcGirt V. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The first claim (Craig Wright v Magnus Granath [2020] EWHC 51 (QB)) relates to Magnus Granath, a citizen of Norway, resident in Oslo, tweeting under the Twitter handle @hodlonaut. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Coin Geek has a piece about the libel action brought by Dr Craig Wright against Peter McCormack. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am by Linda McClain
   By contrast, the party briefs and many of the amicus briefs filed in support of Colorado Civil Rights Commission (CCRC) and Craig and Mullins, the couple for whom Phillips refused to bake a cake, stressed that motive did not matter: discrimination laws aimed at conduct. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Congratulations to Adam Speker of 5RB who was appointed as a QC in the recently published list. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the frequency and timing of the justices’ first questions during oral arguments. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am by Patricia Hughes
Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s decision to prorogue the UK Parliament last week reminded us of Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s twice-proroguing of the Canadian Parliament in the space of about a year. [read post]