Search for: "Adams v. National Collegiate Athletic Association" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, could affect “the actions of some states to legalize medical or personal marijuana use. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, a challenge to the federal ban on sports betting,] that permits New Jersey to authorize sports betting under the state’s ‘partial repeal’ law but otherwise keeps the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act … on the books for other states. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, in which the court struck down the federal law that bars states from legalizing sports betting, “the clear winner in this case is the Tenth Amendment. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, a constitutional challenge to the federal ban on sports betting. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, a case that turns on whether a federal statute can prevent New Jersey from repealing a ban on sports betting, arguing that “the Third Circuit’s decision is a significant threat to the federalism enshrined in our Constitution” and that because “of the principle at stake, this case is about far more than just sports gambling in New Jersey. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
National Collegiate Athletic Association, a case that turns on whether a federal statute can prevent New Jersey from repealing a ban on sports betting, maintaining that “New Jersey has a much stronger chance at securing certiorari review than in 2014, when the Supreme Court declined to hear” an earlier iteration of the case, because the state’s challenge to the statute’s “’affirmative requirement’ compelling states to… [read post]