Search for: "Adoption of Alexander S. (1988)"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2017, 1:03 pm
NCAA’s trademarks, which have been registered with the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:47 am
The ECJ’s future role in interpreting the Regulation could be addressed by adopting a provision similar to Protocol 2 to the 2007 Lugano Convention. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
Burget, 486 U.S. 94, 100–01 (1988)). [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am
It’s a voluntary and confidential process. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 11:45 am
Alexander Shukh v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm
He therefore concluded: 3.6 Insofar as it may be said that the terms of s. 7 are ambiguous or unclear, s. 7 must be interpreted in the light of Article 23 of the Directive. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 7:16 pm
” After she executed her will, she sold her 1984 Ford and bought a 1988 Buick; later, she sold the 1988 Buick and bought a 1993 Chrysler. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
App. 2008), which adopted the Motor Carrier holding is apposite (with emphasis added): [W]e agree with the authorities affirming that a trustee’s section 108(a)’s tolling rights are not transferable to mere assignees of debtor claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Should Bivens exactly track what the Supreme Court had held by 1988? [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am
Metromedia, Inc. (1971), adopting that same standard in defamation cases, as well as the Court’s (and White’s) ultimate rejection of it in Gertz v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Pinske (1988), 30 B.C.L.R. (2d) 114 (B.C.C.A.), aff’d [1989] 2 S.C.R. 979. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:59 am
Miriam Pohl: The Recast of Brussels I – striking the balance between trust and control Roughly two years after the presentation of the Commission’s proposal, the recast of the Brussels I Regulation was adopted on 6 December 2012. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
” But then in 2010, the Court ignored the majority’s conclusion in Freytag and adopted the concurrence’s broader definition and reasoning without comment.9 It would seem then that, for the purposes of the Appointments Clause, a “Department” is any “freestanding component of the Executive Branch, not subordinate to or contained within any other such component. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 5:17 pm
Since the North Carolina statute, as written, deems Section 203(b)(3) to be read as it was in effect in 1988 (before Section 203(b)(3) was repealed), then the repeal of Section 203(b)(3) should not adversely affect the availability of North Carolina’s 15 client exemption. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Fla. 2007); Alexander v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
The American Law Institute’s unfortunate adoption of “strict liability” (sufficiently unfortunate, the ALI has done away with it except for manufacturing defect) missed a lot of product liability issues – the learned intermediary rule for one – that have become extremely widespread and important in product liability over the last 45 years. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Appointments: Lecturer on Law, 1988 ; Assistant Professor of Law, 1991; Professor of Law, 1998. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
Alexander, [931 S.W.2d 517, 521 (Tenn. 1996)] (Court discussed the defendant’s duty to plead comparative fault and identify tortfeasors under Rule 8.03). [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Alexander, Justice Charles W. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Alexander H. [read post]
