Search for: "Adoption of Reed H."
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
§ 303(h)(1). [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
In a 38-page opinion, Judge Reed O’Connor concluded that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge the guidance documents at issue, that their claim was ripe for judicial resolution and that they had a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 6:09 am
This post examines an opinion from the Supreme Court of North Carolina: State of North Carolina v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:10 am
Jan. 11, 2016) (en banc) H/T Eric Goldman. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
From the First Amendment side, we have Reed v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:56 am
When reaching an assessment of the proportionality, of any measure that restricts rights, both our domestic courts and the European Court of Human Rights place great stock on the degree and quality of Parliamentary involvement prior to any measure being adopted. [read post]
19 May 2015, 2:20 am
Comment The Court has adopted a wide interpretation of the scope of the POCA Provisions. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:57 am
., and Jack Reed, D-R.I., and Reps. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:34 pm
., and Jack Reed, D-R.I., and Reps. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
(quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts §911, comment h (1977)). [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:10 pm
The Daily Beast‘s Sally Kohn decried the Court’s reliance on “bunk science” and The Nation‘s Reed Richardson claimed the Hobby Lobby majority’s opinion rested on “species scientific claims. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Este mes se cumpliron sesenta años de uno de los fallos más importantes de todos los tiempos.El 17 de mayo de 1954 el Chief Justice de la Corte Suprema de los Estados Unidos leyó la sentencia de “Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:56 am
H/T to Leslie Burns for first spotting this issue. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
Even if it doesn’t merit federal deference, it represents a valid rule of California constitutional law, which California courts would explicitly adopt as a matter of state law if pressed. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
READ Section I--PP. 2-7 of the WESTLAW VERSION, or 1257-1264 --Michael Reed, "From the ‘Cage’ to the ‘Gaze’? [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:14 am
[A] court can take account of a university’s experience and expertise in adopting or rejecting certain admissions processes. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:50 am
By Reed Mercado In a recent decision from the California Court of Appeals entitled Jolley v. [read post]
