Search for: "Agnew v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 65
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2023, 1:33 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/2/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 1:45 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 03/02/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter, heard 14th June 2022 R (on the application of VIP… [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 26/1/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 2:01 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 1:34 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 13/01/23) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada… [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:12 am by Matrix Law
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 19/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Canada Square… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Matrix Law
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland – Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Northern Ireland) Bill, heard 19th July 2022 R (on the application of VIP Communications Ltd (In Liquidation)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 4th October 2022 McCue (as guardian for Andrew McCue) (AP) v Glasgow City Council, heard 18th October 2022 Unger and another (in substitution for Hasan) v Ul-Hasan (deceased) and another,… [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 5:35 am by Fiona Folkson
[v] The Bill could therefore be introduced as soon as May 2022, although much of the detail is yet to be revealed. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:51 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
   However the Northern Ireland Court of Appeal in Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland and anor v Agnew and Others had reached an opposing view. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 3:02 pm by Steve Lubet
(Spiro Agnew also resigned by letter to Kissinger, but I don't think anyone would look to Agnew as a constitutional authority; I don’t know how John C. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:38 am
  After Ford left the White House in 1977, he privately justified his pardon of Nixon by carrying in his wallet a portion of the text of Burdick v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
That clause states that only an “Officer” may succeed and act as president. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Kent
And third, as Daniel Hemel and Eric Posner have pointed out, the Supreme Court did not apply a clear statement in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
The Oct. 5, 1973, Brief for the United States in In re Agnew. [read post]