Search for: "Albanese v Albanese" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2015, 9:06 am by Eric Goldman
The Ninth Circuit was also briefed on allegedly infringing trademark use that included a Twitter hashtag in Webceleb v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:25 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Appeals Court Reverses GSU Copyright Ruling First off today, Andrew Albanese at Publishers Weekly reports that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court ruling in the George State e-reserve case (Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 2:51 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Corto y delicioso libro, simil de un famoso libro norteamericano sobre cómo hubiera sido resuelto hoy Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
The global financial services industry is still reeling from the regulatory investigations surrounding the Libor scandal. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:20 am
A California appellate court recently addressed this issue in Albanese v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Just because you cut the hair of a B-list celebrity does not make you a celebrity. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 11:13 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: The Oatmeal v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:37 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/INcG7c (Charles Skamser) eDiscovery Case Law: Defendant Responds to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Recusal in Da Silva Moore – bit.ly/KnyPcm (Doug Austin) EDRM and Statistical Sampling - bit.ly/J8fKJ6 (Doug Austin) Email Admissibility: Double Hearsay Satisfied by (1) Business Record Incorporating (2) Admission – 801(d)(2)(B) Does Not Require Employee Have Ability to Bind Employer — Junior Status of Employee Goes to Weight – bit.ly/JoVpyC… [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 2:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A failure in any one element results in a dismissal of the claim (Albanese v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 9:58 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
First, the defendants address the frequent claim made by publishers that the Supreme Court, in Campbell v. [read post]