Search for: "Alexander v. Department of Probation " Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2015, 11:08 am
After Devon Alexander Kane pled guilty to possessing child pornography and was sentenced to 90 days in jail and ten years of probation, due to “medical issues”, he appealed. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
Juarez-Velasquez, Fifth Circuit: Appellant's probation revocation was reversed and vacated because his supervised release expired prior to the date the Probation Office petitioned the court for revocation, depriving the court of jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
Ann. 42-4-206 was expansive and reached any type of non-probate survivorship interest). [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:59 am by Jeff Marshall
The head of Pennsylvania’s Department of Public Welfare, Gary Alexander, has announced his support for moving Medicaid to a block grant. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Aaron
The Court held that the probation condition requiring Mr. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Alexander, No. 07-1758 A sentence for possessing crack cocaine with the intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not commit a plain error in designating defendant a career offender for sentencing purposes as he committed a prior crime of violence, and he otherwise satisfied the criteria necessary to be considered a career offender; and 2) the sentence was otherwise reasonable. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Duhon, No. 05-30387 On remand from the Supreme Court, sentence of probation for possessing child pornography is affirmed over the government's objections that: 1) the district court's failure to apply enhancements requested by the government was reversible error; 2) consideration of the disparity between defendant's and co-defendant's sentences was plain error; 3) the sentencing guidelines precluded sentencing defendant to probation; and 4) the sentence was… [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 6:30 am
Simson, Reflections on Free Exercise: Revisiting 'Rourke v. [read post]