Search for: "All Judges Who Reviewed Appeals"
Results 21 - 40
of 17,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
One key context in which such a question was reviewed was when the Pre-Trial Chamber has been asked to authorize an investigation on the basis of an Article 15 request (proprio motu). [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:12 pm
The appeals court found that “those who are incarcerated, awaiting trial, and without counsel” are in an “extraordinary circumstance that requires federal action. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:03 pm
Rule 2.2(A) provides that [a] judge shall uphold and apply the law, and shall perform all duties of judicial office fairly and impartially. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:12 pm
There was then an investigation by the Prior Misconduct Review Committee. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:29 am
The user appealed the decision stressing that their post emphasized the unity of Libyan people during crises despite all conflicts. [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:00 am
Supreme Court as the justices unanimously ruled that appeals judges were too quick to dismiss the NRA’s claims that New York officials violated its First Amendment rights by targeting its insurance business. [read post]
29 May 2024, 9:55 am
In Florida, this involves presenting the case before a Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC), who will make a decision based on the evidence presented. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am
A review of this decision upheld it, and Mr C brought the judicial review claim. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:56 am
The Opinion of the Court of Appeals Judge E. [read post]
28 May 2024, 4:15 am
It is a venue where fact and issues of law are decided by technical specialists, who are also highly trained in patent law, instead of lay judges and juries. [read post]
28 May 2024, 4:15 am
It is a venue where fact and issues of law are decided by technical specialists, who are also highly trained in patent law, instead of lay judges and juries. [read post]
27 May 2024, 10:46 am
When extraneous offense evidence is admitted during the guilt/innocence phase of the trial and is timely objected to by its opponent, the standard of review on appeal is whether the trial judge clearly abused their discretion by admitting the evidence; that is where the four Montgomery factors come into play. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:45 am
District Judge William H. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:59 am
Judges in committee can say ‘make it so! [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
In a decision that surprises nearly all observers, the Court denies cert. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:51 pm
The time-intensive historical inquiries demanded by originalism pose challenges for district and court of appeals judges with many cases to decide. [read post]
24 May 2024, 3:37 pm
EXPERT REVIEW The BIA is composed of experienced judges who specialize in immigration law. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit for review. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am
Conclusion While these cases are helpful in providing employers guidance in the ongoing backlash against DEI programs, they also send a cautionary message to carefully review all aspects of your DEI initiatives in light of the ongoing risk they may create. [read post]
24 May 2024, 2:01 am
Conclusion While these cases are helpful in providing employers guidance in the ongoing backlash against DEI programs, they also send a cautionary message to carefully review all aspects of your DEI initiatives in light of the ongoing risk they may create. [read post]
