Search for: "All Person Similarly Situated, et al" Results 21 - 40 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2017, 8:30 am by Chris Mirasola
The main focus of the proceedings was motion 502, through which the defense sought to dismiss all of the charges against two of the defendants–Mustafa al-Hawsawi and Ammar al-Baluchi–for lack of personal jurisdiction on the grounds that there was no armed conflict between the United States and al-Qaida prior to October 2001. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm by Hopkins
Similarly, distractions are evaluated based upon three critical reasoning categories: Internal distraction - a situation requiring a response because his/her attention is directed to some event, object, person, or activity inside the vehicle. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm by Hopkins
Similarly, distractions are evaluated based upon three critical reasoning categories: Internal distraction - a situation requiring a response because his/her attention is directed to some event, object, person, or activity inside the vehicle. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:08 am by Marty Lederman
  The firm did not impose such requirements on, or have such expectations with respect to, its similarly situated male candidates for partnership. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am by Courtney Minick
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:44 am by Susan Ross (US)
Mitcham et al, Case No. 1:2016–cv–03224 (Doc. 26, S.D.N.Y. 2016). [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:44 am by Susan Ross (US)
Mitcham et al, Case No. 1:2016–cv–03224 (Doc. 26, S.D.N.Y. 2016). [read post]