Search for: "Amato v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm
New York State Supreme Court, 60 Centre Street We can sit by the fire. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
United States, 2013 U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:50 am
District Court for the District of Columbia referenced my most-noted formulation of this principle in a foreign-cubed piracy case, United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:09 pm
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:49 am
Former United States Senator Alfonse M. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm
Employee Welfare Benefit Plan & Trust, 50 F.3d 1478, 1483 (9th Cir. 1995) (citing Amato v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:26 pm
D'Amato, The Coerciveness of International LawL.F. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:06 am
"Financial Contracts and ‘Junk Bonds’ Purchases in the Italian Legal System: A Matter of (In)Correct Disclosure" Opinio Juris in Comparatione, Vol.1/2010, Paper No. 2 CRISTINA AMATO, University of BresciaEmail: amato@jus.unibs.itThe essay is concerned with the protection of investors against purchases of ‘junk bonds’. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
Thomas Porteous, Jr., while a Federal judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge, as follows: Judge Porteous, while presiding as a United States district judge in Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Title: Amato v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Amato , No. 06-5600, 06-5741, 07-2152, 07-2311 Convictions and sentences for series of frauds against several states and a corporation are affirmed over claims that the district court erred by: 1) refusing to grant a new trial based on the government's alleged withholding of impeachment material and newly discovered exculpatory evidence; 2) refusing to sever defendants' trials; 3) improperly instructing the jury as to the meaning of "false statements" and… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 3:43 am
The multi-million dollar legal and forensic accounting fees incurred by companies investigating fraud perpetrated by their executives may be included in a restitution order under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA), the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 6:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 8:06 am
United States, 549 F. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:09 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeFraud Convict Denied Bail Pending Appeal; Burdens of Proof on Claims Not Met United States v. [read post]
