Search for: "Amazon v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2016, 3:57 am
The recent CJEU judgment in VKI v Amazon (C-191/15) concerns jurisdiction both in the context of conflict of laws (applicable consumer laws) and the Data Protection Directive. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:15 pm
There is no dispute in B.F. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:05 pm
As Eric notes, the court calls out Amazon for not including a term stating that parents agree to the terms on behalf of their children. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
It chooses not to sell directly on Amazon. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:25 pm
Perfect 10 ruling, the court cleans out all of the state law claims (unfair competition, state trademark infringement, tortious interference, negligence and unjust enrichment) due to Section 230. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:54 pm
Case Citation: Kabbaj v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:37 am
Murray v. amazon.com Services LLC, et al., USDC-NJ, Case No. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:59 am
Zelinsky, Cardozo School of Law, has published New York Appellate Division Upholds 'Amazon' Law: Analysis in State Tax Notes (2011). [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 1:32 am
As Amazon is not to be seen under items I to V, Amazon does not fall under vi. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
M-Edge Accessories LLC v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 11:00 pm
Edward Zelinsky (Cardozo) has posted The Siren Song of State Amazon Laws: The Colorado Example, 59 State Tax Notes ___ (2011), on SSRN. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm
The post Test Buys Don’t Create Personal Jurisdiction Over Amazon Merchant–Oceanside v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 12:27 pm
Deetsch v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 8:57 am
: Password-sharing is a “ubiquitous, useful, and generally harmless” activity that “millions of people” engage in, United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 6:42 pm
She stated, “The only warranty provided for a product comes from the third-party seller. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 2:30 pm
Chris Sagers Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University, analyzes Coty, Amazon, and the Future of Vertical Restraints: Evolving Distribution Norms on Both Atlantic Shores. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Case citation: King v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:33 am
Lasoff v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Amazon not vicariously liable for copyright infringement by hosting e-commerce platform for sale of allegedly infringing photo, but could be liable for contributory infringement – Masck v. [read post]
