Search for: "Amerada Hess"
Results 21 - 40
of 58
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
Amerada Hess Corporation, No. 100091 (17th JDC) appears to be the first time a state court has directly interpreted the meaning of the phrase “original condition” in the Article 22 context. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:47 am
Amerada Hess Corporation, No. 100091 (17th JDC) appears to be the first time a state court has directly interpreted the meaning of the phrase “original condition” in the Article 22 context. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:34 pm
Amerada Hess Corporation, 2010-2267 (La. 10/25/2011) –So.3d --. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
” Amerada Hess Corp. v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 999 F. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428 (1989)). [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 3:19 am
Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:49 am
Amerada Hess Corp. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:36 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that involved a predial (not a mineral) lease, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent buyer of the land. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:22 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 168 N.J. 236, 251 (2001). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 8:49 am
The court notes that Borison’s curriculum vitae shows that he has forty years of experience in the maritime industry, which includes six years as a safety representative of Amerada Hess Corporation and sixteen years as a safety supervisor at McDermott, Inc. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:00 am
Amerada Hess Corporation, a plaintiff who purchased property after environmental damage had been done did not have a right of action against those who caused the damage unless his seller specifically transferred that right in the Act of Sale. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:36 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that involved a predial (not a mineral) lease, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent buyer of the land. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:37 pm
The City also cites Wills v Amerada Hess Corp. in support of dismissal. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that did not involve mineral rights, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent purchaser of the land. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 2010-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:26 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 769 So. 2d 1105, 1107 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 766 cmt. n (1977)). [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that did not involve mineral rights, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent purchaser of the land. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:49 am
Amerada Hess Corp., 2010-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 2:22 pm
Amerada Hess Corp., 10-2267 (La. 10/25/11), 79 So. 3d 246, a case that did not involve mineral rights, the Louisiana Supreme Court held that whether damage to property is apparent or unapparent, the right to sue for such damage is a personal right that belongs to the landowner at the time the damage occurred unless the right has been explicitly assigned or subrogated to the subsequent purchaser of the land. [read post]
