Search for: "American Chemistry Council v. EPA"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 11:01 am
The American Chemistry Council has noted that updating the legislation in certain respects made good sense, favoring a comprehensive approach, rather than the current patchwork of state and federal laws governing chemicals. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, on January 23 granting EPA’s motion to dismiss American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:17 pm
Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, American Petroleum Institute, American Chemistry Council, etc. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 8:42 am
EPA - 5/6/14. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am
EPA, case numbers 09-1322, 10-1092 and 10-1073; and American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm
American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
On American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1153; American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:47 am
They include the US Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Manufacturers, American Chemistry Council, American Iron and Steel Institute and the industry-funded Coalition for Responsible Regulation. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am
<> The Science Does Not Support the Call to Remove Phthalates from Vinyl Flooring – The American Chemistry Council (ACC) says, "We urge retailers and their customers to closely examine the misleading claims, rather than allowing scare tactics to distort the facts about phthalates used in vinyl flooring. [read post]
22 May 2013, 11:27 am
Two years ago, in the case of American Electric Power v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 5:53 pm
The EPA or American Chemistry Council, intervenor, are likely to request a rehearing on the matter or file an appeal, or both. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
As an example, the American Chemistry Council indicates in part, "There are several recent regulations that deserve scrutiny because of their anticipated consequences, including the "Boiler MACT" rules . . . and EPA's rules regulating greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm
The lead case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
Many scientists have become increasingly concerned about the effect industrial emissions of CO2 are having on the chemistry of the world’s oceans and about the fallout for many species of marine animals. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The American Chemistry Council claimed that the rule will place significant burdens on chemical producers without any significant reduction in accidental releases of hazardous materials. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
