Search for: "American Express Co. v. Baker" Results 21 - 40 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 1:23 pm by Bexis
Philadelphia Co. 2003); Kalinowski v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:50 pm
The Applicants also made a number of submissions regarding a reasonable apprehension of bias, based on Baker v. [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 6:54 pm
The Applicants also made a number of submissions regarding a reasonable apprehension of bias, based on Baker v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
But the argument bombed in a moot session and ultimately attracted only the vote of Justice Denise Johnson in Baker v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
American Express Co., in which the court ruled that American Express’ anti-steering rules do not violate federal antitrust law, “delivered a big blow to antitrust law and its traditional mission of helping consumers and fostering economic competition. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
American Express Co., which involves the application of antitrust law to credit-card-network anti-steering rules. [read post]