Search for: "American Express Co. v. Michigan"
Results 21 - 40
of 176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
See the Identifying Express and Implied Claims section here. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
The state constitutions were universally understood as creations of the American people themselves. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm
Nine states, including Massachusetts, Michigan, and California, set no minimum marriage age, and some of what UAL estimates are the hundreds of thousands of American women and girls currently in what began (or continue) as child marriages were married at the age of ten.Sasha K. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 11:59 am
§ 1752) that are not included in the United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Fletcher, Foundation Professor of Law & Director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center, Michigan State University College of Law -- Nomos and Anishinaabe Inaakonigewin M. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
Michigan Chamber of Commerce and of the four dissenters in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
Co., Inc., 102 F.3d 223, 226 (6th Cir. 1996) (citing Nogueroas v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm
In a forthcoming article in the Michigan Law Review, professors Quinn Curtis of the University of Virginia School of Law, Jill E. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:01 pm
In the famous footnote 4 of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
The committee will hear testimony from Luis Almagro, secretary general of the Organization of American States; Deborah Ulmer, regional director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the National Democratic Institute; and Ryan Berg, fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
She co-founded the Women’s Rights Project at the American Civil Liberties Union. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, which covers Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 6:55 pm
Gore,” said Nathaniel Persily, a Stanford law professor and co-director of the Stanford-M.I.T. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
(1999) El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
It was not just any marriage suit; it was one of the cases decided in Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
At the very least, don’t the expressed views of five Justices that these powers are insufficient create something that is, as fellow Verdict columnist Mike Dorf put it in an amicus brief co-authored with Marty Lederman, “for all practical purposes precedential”? [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm
In Honda Motor Co v Oberg (512 U.S. 415 (1994)), for instance, Ginsburg dissented from the Court’s decision that an amendment to the Oregon Constitution that prevented review of a punitive-damage award violated the Due Process Clause of the federal Constitution, referring to other protections against excessive punitive-damage awards in Oregon law. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
The Second Circuit ruled in Altitude Express, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 10:10 am
The protesters and the City are violating Michigan laws that ban discrimination in public accommodations. [read post]
