Search for: "Amicus Curiae Brief of Apple Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2017, 1:27 pm
The United States as amicus curiae suggested a test, see Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 27–29, but Samsung and Apple did not brief the issue. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 9:43 am
Briefs of amicus curiae may be filed without consent. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am
Under Supreme Court R. 37, the Call for Response reopens the period for filing of an amicus curiae brief in support of petitioner. (~ due October 8, 2016). [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
I've uploaded its amicus curiae brief to Scribd. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
"Systems Inc. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Although not a party, the Solicitor General has requested permission to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Currently pending in the U.S. courts is a case[20] in which the U.S. government is relying on the SCA to compel Microsoft to produce email stored in Ireland;[21] Microsoft is resisting on the ground that the SCA cannot compel production of data stored abroad; and the Government of Ireland has filed an amicus brief asserting its sovereignty, but conceding that it is “incumbent upon Ireland to acknowledge” that its own Supreme Court has “held that . . . there… [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm
Those amicus curiae briefs always come with a disclaimer that no party took part in drafting the brief or supported it financially. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
As stated by Apple, Inc. in an amicus curiae brief to the Supreme Court, the opening line of many negotiations with patent trolls is some form of “What we are asking for is less than it will cost you to litigate this case to judgment. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
http://t.co/UPF30pH1Lf -> The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:16 pm
Amicus curiae briefs must be filed with U.S. appeals courts "no later than 7 days after the principal brief of the party being supported is filed". [read post]
15 May 2013, 8:57 am
The reply brief obviously reinforces these points:With respect to the risk of low FRAND royalties (and damages) disincentivizing participation in standard-setting, Google points to Qualcomm's amicus curiae brief. [read post]
Federal Circuit denies Google motion to terminate Apple's appeal of Wisconsin rate-setting dismissal
3 May 2013, 9:23 am
I mentioned in March that Microsoft's amicus curiae brief says certain issues are "not properly before" the Federal Circuit in this case. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 11:49 pm
The first companies to submit amicus curiae briefs in support of Judge Posner's FRAND ruling favoring Apple were Intel and Microsoft, as I reported yesterday. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:12 pm
For now the document is sealed, but the headline has appeared on the electronic document system of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit:BRIEF TENDERED from Intel Corporation Title: BRIEF FOR AMICUS CURIAE INTEL CORPORATION IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am
Easterbrook, Commencement Address, Swarthmore College - Bob Kohn, Brief of Bob Kohn as Amicus Curiae, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:05 pm
Should the appeals court disagree with Apple, all supporters of Judge Posner's stance on FRAND have only about five weeks from today to submit their amicu curiae briefs. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:09 am
Amazon.com, Inc (Docket Report) ITC judge rules against HTC’s first complaint against Apple: Certain Portable Electronic Devices and Related Software (337-TA-721) — but it’s not over yet (FOSS Patents) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Acer – Failure to file motion requesting testimony at Markman hearing bars submission of expert declaration in support of Markman briefing: U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
[FMLC-Reply-Brief] [Order-Re-Wham-O-Oral-Arg] [Cato-Brief] [Brief-of-Amicus-Curiae-Chamber-of-Commerce] [USA-Brief-in-Wham-O] [Wham-O-Brief] Article One launches 3 Patent Studies Focused on 4 Patents on by Lodsys In response to the lawsuit Lodsys filed against several Apple iPhone developers, [Link] Article One is offering a $5,000 reward per study for the best prior art reference that provides a path to invalidity.… [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:39 am
To see what linguistic evidence was presented, you can look at Neal Goldfarb's amicus curiae brief, which ca also be found via his blog. [read post]
